Massachusetts Lottery May Soon Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has drawn up a framework for the regulation of DFS in the Bay State.
The Massachusetts Lottery Commission is proposing modernization that is sweeping and has formally stated its intent to adopt online ticket sales, as well as offering its very own daily dream sports and social gaming items.
Massachusetts is making noises about adopting a comprehensive online gaming package for a while, since it seeks to complement its emergent land-based casino industry and successful lottery product with a far more up-to-date and competitive online offering.
While online casino gaming and poker would need a huge upheaval that is legislative DFS and social gaming wouldn’t normally ( at the very least into the Bay State), also it’s clear that Massachusetts is intent on creating unique fantasy sports product as a way attracting younger generation that eschews traditional draws, scratch cards and keno in favor of more recent, mobile-friendly styles.
Formal Invitation
As such, their state has launched a formal obtain information (RFI), inviting companies to submit ‘proposals for the development, implementation, operational support, and maintenance of a Massachusetts Lottery iLottery System,’ read an official statement.
This could include ‘the development and integration of digital versions of existing and new lottery games, including but not restricted to social video gaming and daily dream recreations options.’
Of particular interest to the Lottery Commission are player authentication and registration protocols, also as recommendations for responsible gaming controls.
The commission also states that it is searching for ways of integrating lottery ticket retailers so that you can protect the 7,500-odd businesses that are small depend on lottery sales commissions.
Homegrown Product
‘We think the introduction of a fantasy activities platform at Massachusetts Lottery would help to embrace a market that is emerging continuing to protect our retail partners,’ Lottery Executive Director Michael Sweeney told the News provider recently.
‘ This particular type of game would not cannibalize our existing products. It could obviously be a product that is new. It would help us to engage what we would refer to as a ‘next-generation’ player and hopefully it would also help Lottery to create a revenue that is new in contrast to eroding or keeping existing offers.’
Over the border in New York State, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is railing contrary to the ‘fraudulent’ nature of this DFS industry, but Massachusetts’ AG Maura Healey has declared there are no federal or state regulations that preclude such sites from running.
Healy has proposed full regulation of DFS, drawing up protocols to protect customers, and has said that state residents who play DFS should ‘not be concerned’ that they are breaking the law.
Most likely, there’s nothing wrong with embracing just a little local innovation, and DraftKings, created and bred in Boston, is possibly benefitting from being casino-online-australia.net a homegrown success story.
India Supreme Court Panel Recommends Legalizing Sports Betting
Former India Supreme Court Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha is recommending that the country legalize cricket betting and gambling in order to crackdown on corruption. (Image: The Hindu)
India is one step closer to legalizing sports betting and gambling after a panel appointed by the nation’s Supreme Court recommended modifying the longstanding video gaming ban in order to combat a growing epidemic of illegal wagering.
Home to over 1.2 billion individuals, India is the second-most populated country in the globe.
Now three lawmakers, former Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha, along with retired Justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, opined to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that legalized recreations gambling would provide more transparency and reduce rogue backdoor wagering.
‘It [betting] would provide both the game and economy if legalized,’ Lodha told reporters on Monday, adding that the market should be opened, but only with extensive safeguards set up to ensure that players and those with direct ties to activities matches are banned from participating.
2013 Scandal
Last January, India’s Supreme Court formed the panel, with Lodha serving as president, in response to the 2013 Indian Premier League match-fixing scandal that rocked the sport and dominated headlines.
The events of 2013 were unprecedented though the sport of cricket is no stranger to controversy.
The investigation that is lengthy Delhi Police led to charges against 39 people and two-year suspensions for the Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings cricket teams.
The match-fixing that is widespread illegal betting led the BCCI to do something to enhance its infrastructure and appearance for ways to mend its moral standing.
The acts that are criminal resulted in intervention by the Supreme Court and Lodha’s panel concluding that BCCI and India should embrace a controlled gambling market to get rid of illegal betting systems and precisely monitor players and officials.
BCCI Unlikely to Embrace New Vision
Cricket is probably the most popular task in India, even though the sport’s governing body claims it wants to completely clean up its league, the federal government might not be so wanting to closing gambling prohibition.
Apart from horse racing, gambling in India has been illegal for nearly 150 years.
In addition to proposing legal cricket gambling, Lodha’s outline additionally suggests transforming the BCCI’s power framework and organization from top to bottom. The BCCI has remained mum on the Lodha report thus far.
The choice to authorize gaming and activities betting doesn’t reside with the BCCI; that task goes to officials on their state and federal amounts.
‘ The federal government will probably keep it alone because it is still a contentious issue,’ Asia Bet Managing Director George Oborne told eGaming Review.
Gambling has largely been a states’ liberties topic over the full years, but of the country’s 29 states and seven territories, just three have taken steps to expand the industry: Goa, Daman, and Sikkim.
Though gambling can provide substantial revenues and monies for local governments, many in India think any expansion of gambling also leads to an expansion in crime, corruption, and cash laundering.
Lodha argues gambling’s already there, albeit illegally, and that swift action needs to be taken.
‘With big money and attention, there is not the caution that is necessary protect the game and its own players from the orgy of excess,’ he said.
Second PokerStars Boycott Struggles to Make Impact After Very First Effort Fizzled
Ike Haxton, whom resigned on New Year’s as a PokerStars Pro in protest at the changes to the VIP system day. (Image: pokerstars.com)
A 2nd PokerStars boycott by high-stakes and high-variance players is apparently failing to produce a dent that is discernible at minimum on the webpage’s traffic numbers.
Around 1,600 players enrolled in the protest, according to organizers.
Per industry number-cruncher PokerScout.com, while traffic dipped on January 1st, the initial day’s the hit, it actually rose on January 2nd, when compared to the same day the previous week, while Sunday, January 3rd remained on par with figures from the same time the earlier week.
Of course, it’s impossible to know just how much the sudden dearth of high stakes players affects PokerStars’ daily rake, and whether all the players who pledged to sit out have in truth proved real to their word.
The boycott, which is due to finish Thursday, January 7th, has been organized by several groups WeArePokerPlayers.com that is including and.com, along with a wide range of high-profile, high stakes players on the 2+2 forums, in protest towards a major overhaul to the VIP system, which took effect on January 1st.
PokerStars announced in November that these changes would include scrapping Supernova Elite rewards for 2016, despite the achievement of this status being a process that is two-year.
Boycott Backfired?
PokerStars claims that the modifications are designed to improve the poker ecology, nevertheless they leave high-stakes, high-volume players high and dry.
While these players represent some of your website’s most avid, long-term, and high-ranking players, they are generally net-withdrawing players as opposed to the hordes of net-depositors that the internet poker giant is anxious to attract.
The first boycott took place between December 1st and 3rd, with 2,600 players joining in the sit out. But that occasion clashed with the PokerStars Christmas Festival, so traffic figures remained comparable, except that those high-stakes players were changed with lower stakes players attracted by low buy-ins and jackpot rewards.
While PokerStars is likely to have raked less during that period, it declared itself vindicated by the boycott december.
‘During the boycott that is three-day recorded the healthiest consecutive three-day ecosystem link between the year with steady net gaming revenue, even though our net-depositing players lost at a much lower rate than they will have all year,’ wrote Eric Hollreiser, VP of Communications for PokerStars and Amaya.
More Boycotts Planned
The affected players remain undeterred, but, and are determined to exhibit PokerStars that they can make the operator’s life hard.
And much more boycotts are planned within the future. WeArePokerPlayers.com has launched a campaign searching for 5,000 signatures to accept at the least a strike that is month-long while other protestors have actually recommended that a 10,000-player boycott could reduce PokerStars’ rake by just as much as 30 %.
On New Year’s Day, Ike Haxton became the second high-profile PokerStars Pro to resign in disgust at the changes, following the exemplory case of Alex Millar, who severed ties because of the site prior to the holiday period.
‘As a four time Supernova Elite, I am aware what it takes to rake 1M VPP in a year,’ published haxton on 2+2. ‘It’s a tough routine. For some of the players that do it, it is an all-consuming dedication more intense than most full-time jobs.
‘Many of these have relocated far from their homes and families to pursue it,’ he added. ‘Finding out, just while you approach the finish line, that your efforts will not be rewarded as you expected them to be is brutal. I cannot in good conscience continue to endorse a poker site that treats its players this way.’