The capital structure shows simply how much financial leverage a company has on its books with regards to other capital such as for instance equity. Potential investors go through the capital structure and identify the actual quantity of debt raised by the company and also this helps them to assess the possibility of financial distress. A risk that is high of distress is associated with bankruptcy. Yet, having debt that is too little the books can possibly prevent the company from checking up on the industry growth rates. Therefore, it is critical to understand the key elements associated with the capital structure and its particular impact on company value (Chowdhury and Chowdhury, 2010).
Companies have already been participating in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) for many decades. In reality, it has been one of several major modes of growth for companies operating in saturated markets. It is a way that is simple boost a company’s sales, enter a new market or increase efficiency through synergy. However, M&A are not successful in each and every case. There have been instances that are many a merger or an acquisition proved to be a value destructor in the place of a value creator. Therefore, it is vital to investigate whether M&A activity actually creates value or not (Zollo and Meier, 2008).
Finance literature has two views that are different the dividend policy. One view suggests that dividends are irrelevant for value whereas one other view states that dividends have implications for value. The original theory of irrelevance of dividends for value was empirically tested by DeAngelo and DeAngelo (2006) plus the authors rejected the model which was suggested by Miller and Modigliani (1961). The research demonstrated that the payout policy was relevant and investment policy had not been the only determinant of firm value. The observations were inherent even to markets that are frictionless. However, the research paid attention to total payouts rather than cash dividends only. Thereby, no distinction was made between distributing earnings to shareholders in the form of dividends or stock repurchases (Handley, 2008).
To look at the full essay click here
The Mean-Variance approach is a type of portfolio optimisation method which will be based on the assumption that every investors make rational investment decisions if they’re given use of market information that is complete. The Black-Litterman model is a more advanced method of portfolio optimisation on the other hand. The reason that is primary developing this model was so it aimed to overcome fundamental issues such as errors in estimation, portfolios that are too concentrated, and technical issues such as for example input sensitivity. The two approaches have their own strengths and weaknesses (Idzorek, 2007). This paper is designed to discuss these features and also make a comparison that can be of value to investors.
You will find an estimated 6.5 million adults within the UK alone who will be classified as carers (Carers UK, 2015) , with rates expected to rise to 9 million individuals by 2037 (Ibid.). Carers are individuals who take on the day to day support needs of family unit members who will be struggling with chronic physical or health that is mental (Baguley and Sprung, 2017), as they are considered to save the economy around Ј132 billion every year, equating to on average Ј19,336 per year, per carer (Carers UK, 2015). Whereas approximately 3 million carers combine employment with providing care, Care UK (2015) estimate that 20% of carers are forced to abandon work altogether due to the high demands positioned on them, both physically and emotionally. The provision of long term caregiving happens to be connected to increased health issues (Wolff et al., 2016), increased social isolation (Hayes et al., 2015) and decreased total well being (Jeong et al., 2015).
Contemporary nursing practice is a varied and challenging field and nurses are increasingly involved in complex decision-making because their roles expand when you look at the health system (Cherry and Jacob, 2016). Underlying any care decision could be the need certainly to identify the source of this problem after which to build up a suitable approach to addressing this issue. To help in decision-making, it is strongly recommended that nurses adopt frameworks or different types of problem-solving and care planning (Johansen and O’Brien, 2016). The assessment, planning, implementing and approach that is evaluating also referred to as APIE (Yura and Walsh, 1967), is a commonly used approach to care planning in nursing practice. This method encourages a systematic and approach that is rigorous patient care, incorporating a holistic perspective associated with the care process. The goal of this paper is always to assess the individual aspects of the APIE and also the approach in its entirety pertaining to nursing practice.
Written by Raymond H.
To look at the full essay click here
The acronym ‘ADPIE’ – which stands for assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation – is used in the field of nursing to aid guide the process that is proper of provision for patients (Bernard, 2018). This process may be used in either physical or psychological state settings essay writers, and follows exactly the same process regardless of what branch of medicine clinicians are working in (Ibid.). This essay will introduce Jerry, a patient with possible alcohol issues, that is a 68 year man that is old drinking is actually concerning to his family and friends, and whose memory has been said to be getting rapidly worse. It is of note here that in line with the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s Code (NMC, 2015), ‘Jerry’ is a pseudonym to maintain confidentiality that is patient with no other personally identifiable information will probably be used in this essay. Each stage shall be outlined below; decisions and actions shall be supported both by clinical guidelines and by peer reviewed evidence was relevant in order to demonstrate the ADPIE process.
Published by John C.
To see the full essay click here
The past few decades have experienced a growing public fascination with the application of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Despite a generally positive attitude with regards to its use and safety, concerns do remain in regards to the effectiveness of these therapies (Barnes et al., 2004). Inspite of the expansion associated with the scientific knowledge base of Western medicine, the global rise in popularity of CAM therapies has seen a dramatic increase over immediate past; a stable rise in the lifetime prevalence among these therapies have also been reported in developed countries (Kessler et al., 2001). Research groups have suggested several determinants that could determine this CAM that is increased- these include those of geographical, cultural, socio-economic, and physical contexts (Shaikh & Hatcher, 2007). The geographical determinant has, by far, been probably the most accepted amongst these- several developing countries have already been observed to utilize CAM therapy as basic treatment line (Tan et al., 2004). However, the prevalence with this does further vary between urban and areas that are rural these countries. Nevertheless, even countries with national insurance systems have seen a rise in the public’s use and acceptance of CAM- where these therapies aren’t covered by insurance; thus suggesting that these therapies might have benefits that outweigh their costs (Frass et al., 2012). The clinical effectiveness of these therapies seem debatable- with CAM professionals themselves leaning towards the requirement of a “more scientific” testing prior to the use of these therapies (Raza et al., 2018) despite these increased usage patterns. This paper aims to gauge the effectiveness of alternative treatment within the treatment of common illnesses.
Evidence-based practice is a cornerstone of contemporary medical and nursing care (Aveyard & Sharp, 2013) and may be viewed the gold standard approach to care. The central tenet of evidence-based practice is the fact that a target appraisal of published literature can help isolate the most effective interventions, which may then be applied in practice, while deciding the preferences and considerations regarding the patient (Hamer & Collinson, 2014). The individual nurse is in charge of making certain they adopt an evidence-based approach to care, appraising research highly relevant to their professional duties and responsibilities (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2011). As such, critiquing is a key skill that must certanly be developed and practised by all nurses and healthcare professionals alike.
The private, Cultural, and Structural Analysis (PCS) model explains how power relationships are expressed between individuals, groups, as well as in the wider society. The PCS model also highlights the effect that is layered of on individuals (Pepper, 2012). The model was initially proposed by Neil Thompson in his book ‘Anti-Discriminatory Practice: Equality, Diversity and Social Justice’. It is said to have three interrelated level such as personal, cultural, and structural (Thompson, 2012).
In line with the PCS model, the workings of oppression can be analysed through these levels, that are elucidated in detail below.