We tell ypu about site content Accessibility recommendations (WCAG) 2.0

W3C Advice 11 December 2008

Please relate to the errata with this document, that may add normative modifications.

This document can also be obtainable in non-normative platforms, offered by Alternate Versions of site content Accessibility tips 2.0.

Copyright © 2008 W3C ® (MIT , ERCIM , Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C obligation, document and trademark usage rules use.

Site content Accessibility recommendations (WCAG) 2.0 covers a range that is wide of to make site content more accessible. After these recommendations will likely make content available to a wider selection of people who have disabilities, including blindness and low eyesight, deafness and hearing loss, learning disabilities, intellectual limits, limited motion, message disabilities, photosensitivity and combinations of those. After these instructions also make your Web often content more usable to users generally speaking.

WCAG 2.0 success requirements are written as testable statements which are not technology-specific. Guidance about satisfying the success criteria in specific technologies, in addition to basic details about interpreting the success requirements, is provided in documents that are separate. See site content Accessibility recommendations (WCAG) Overview for an introduction and links to WCAG technical and academic product.

WCAG 2.0 succeeds site content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 WCAG10, that was posted as a W3C advice might 1999. Though it is achievable to conform either to WCAG 1.0 or even to WCAG 2.0 (or both), the W3C suggests that brand new and updated content use WCAG 2.0. The W3C additionally recommends that internet accessibility policies guide WCAG 2.0.

Reputation with this Document

This part defines the status of the document during the period of its book. Other papers may supersede this document. A summary of present W3C publications and also the latest modification for this technical report are located in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

This is actually http://www.ninjaessays.info/ the content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 W3C Recommendation from the net Content Accessibility instructions performing Group.

This document happens to be evaluated by W3C Members, by pc pc software designers, and also by other groups that are w3C interested events, and it is endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation. It really is a document that is stable can be utilized as guide product or cited from another document. W3C’s part to make the advice would be to draw awareness of the specification also to market its extensive implementation. This improves the functionality and interoperability associated with the internet.

WCAG 2.0 is sustained by the connected non-normative papers, Understanding WCAG 2.0 and approaches for WCAG 2.0. Although those papers would not have the status that is formal WCAG 2.0 it self has, they offer information crucial that you understanding and implementing WCAG.

The Working Group requests that any remarks be produced with the provided online comment type. Should this be impossible, remarks can be sent to also [email protected]. The archives when it comes to general public commentary list are publicly available. Responses received in the WCAG 2.0 Recommendation cannot result in modifications to the form of the principles, but might be addressed in errata or future variations of WCAG. The performing Group doesn’t intend to make formal reactions to reviews. Archives for the WCAG WG email list conversations are publicly available, and work that is future because of the performing Group may deal with remarks gotten with this document.

This document happens to be produced as part of the W3C online Accessibility Initiative (WAI). The objectives regarding the WCAG performing Group are talked about when you look at the WCAG performing Group charter. The WCAG performing Group is component regarding the WAI Technical Activity.

This document ended up being generated by an organization running underneath the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a list that is public of patent disclosures manufactured in connection aided by the deliverables regarding the team; that page comes with directions for disclosing a patent. Someone who has knowledge that is actual of patent that your individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must reveal the details in conformity with part 6 for the W3C Patent Policy.

dining Table of articles

  • Introduction
    • WCAG 2.0 Layers of Guidance
    • WCAG 2.0 documents that are supporting
    • Crucial Terms in WCAG 2.0
  • WCAG 2.0 Instructions
    • 1 Perceivable
      • 1.1 Provide text options for any non-text content to make certain that it may be turned into other designs people require, such as for example big print, braille, speech, symbols or simpler language.
      • 1.2 offer options for time-based media.
      • 1.3 content that is create are presented in numerous means (for example simpler design) without losing information or framework.
      • 1.4 allow it to be easier for users to see and hear content including separating foreground from back ground.
    • 2 Operable
      • 2.1 Make all functionality available from a keyboard.
      • 2.2 offer users time that is enough read and employ content.
      • 2.3 Try not to design content in way that is proven to cause seizures.
      • 2.4 offer methods to assist users navigate, find content, and discover where these are typically.
    • 3 Understandable
      • 3.1 Make text content understandable and readable.
      • 3.2 Make website pages look and operate in predictable means.
      • 3.3 Assistance users avoid and correct mistakes.
    • 4 Robust
      • 4.1 Maximize compatibility with present and future user agents, including assistive technologies.
  • Conformance
    • Conformance Demands
    • Conformance Claims (Optional)
    • Statement of Partial Conformance – Alternative Party Content
    • Statement of Partial Conformance – Language

Appendices

  • Appendix A: Glossary (Normative)
  • Appendix B: Acknowledgments
  • Appendix C: Sources